Twelve Angry Men Essay -- Twelve Angry Men

Twelve smouldering Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the essay presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personalized bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what Im talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who initially are strangers to each other have the fate of a young boy resting in the palm of their hands. In the low gear everyone is disposed he is guilty except one who has one reasonable doubt in his mind. The single man on his own was able to convince each of them by using logic to examine the testimony of each witness. After a few hours of argumentation the jurors were eventually won over allowing the facts to bruise their personal issues. During the arguments in the jury room the issues of race, age, social class, personal experien ce and stereo types are discussed a number of times. I presume it is because those are the personal issues that people have and sometimes that is what they base their judgment on. When you are in a jury you have the responsibility of setting all of that aside. Through the reasoning of the not-guilty voters the guilty voters are slowly realizing that despite their passed and personal reasons they have to take into consideration the more important actual events that occurred. Part of the problem the jurors are...